NickC wrote:
No - diskwriggler needs to be run on a client machine.
Any specific reason why I can't just copy a single 5GB file and do a rough comparison? So far, I have tested the same file, on the same initiating client machine (Mac Pro), on the same network:
1. Copy a 5GB file from Mac pro to Mac mini connected to a FW800 external casing (SATA drive): Less than 1 min, 65MB/sec
2. Copy a 5GB file from Mac pro to Mac mini internal 2.5" (SATA drive): Less than 3 min, 48MB/sec
3. Copy a 5GB file from Mac pro to PC NAS box running FreeNAS (ATA drive 160GB connected to motherboard): Less than 3 min, 45MB/sec
4. Copy a 5GB file from Mac pro to PC NAS box running FreeNAS (SATA drive 160GB connected to Adaptec 2410SA): Less than 4 min, 20MB/sec
5. Copy a 5GB file from Mac pro to PC NAS box running NASLite+2 (SATA drive 160GB connected to Adaptec 2410SA): Less than 32 min, 4MB/sec
In # 4 & 5, I have formatted the drives to RAID0 inside the Adaptec BIOS on bootup of the PC, prior to FreeNAS or NASLite running, and then formatted/initialized it again in the NAS OS.
I am very puzzled. If this card is supported in NASLite+, why is it performing the worst of the lot? BTW, I have tried reaching the company via email and twitter many times, but have yet to receive any response. It looks like the people in this forum are more helpful than the company itself. High points for an active forum, but fail points on the company support.
Anyone has a direct link to someone in support that can look at this peculiar issue?