NASLite Network Attached Storage

www.serverelements.com
Task-specific simplicity with low hardware requirements.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:11 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:58 am
Posts: 6
Hi Tony,

I have what seems to be a simple problem:

at home I have a NASLite+ box using subnet 192.168.50.x/255.255.255.0

at work I have a subnet of 192.168.0.x/255.255.255.0

these two networks are connected via an IPSEC tunnel.

When I try to access the NASLite+ box from a computer at work, I get no response (even when pinging)

If I PPTP into my home network from work I CAN access the NASLIte+ box but this is because PPTP server gives up an IP address whereas IPSEC doesn't.

I was wondering if it was possible to give the NASLite+ box a default gateway (which, in this case is also the IPSEC tunnel endpoint) ???

NMB log excerpt:

[2005/03/10 15:40:33, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(755)
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.149(138) ERRNO=Network is unreachable
[2005/03/10 15:40:42, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(755)
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.149(138) ERRNO=Network is unreachable
[2005/03/10 15:40:46, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(755)
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.149(138) ERRNO=Network is unreachable
[2005/03/10 15:40:51, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(755)
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.149(137) ERRNO=Network is unreachable
[2005/03/10 15:40:51, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:reply_netbios_packet(965)
reply_netbios_packet: send_packet to IP 192.168.0.149 port 137 failed
[2005/03/10 15:43:01, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(755)
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.149(138) ERRNO=Network is unreachable
[2005/03/10 15:43:10, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(755)
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.149(138) ERRNO=Network is unreachable
[2005/03/10 15:43:14, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(755)
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.149(138) ERRNO=Network is unreachable
[2005/03/10 16:06:20, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(755)
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.149(138) ERRNO=Network is unreachable
[2005/03/10 16:06:24, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(755)
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.149(138) ERRNO=Network is unreachable
[2005/03/10 16:06:28, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(755)
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.149(138) ERRNO=Network is unreachable


Thanks

-Hankster-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 4:11 pm
Posts: 1771
Location: Server Elements
Currently, NASLite+ does not support a default gateway setting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 4:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:01 am
Posts: 170
Location: Staffordshire UK
I have found there are a number of "extras" that I would like to see on Naslite but at the end of the day it does exactly what it says on the tin, its not like it says it has raid support and doesn't or has the ability to support a default gateway and doesn't. Any of the suggested extras that are mentioned in the forums would be great if they get to be included in future builds but this system was designed for home/small business use as a network attached storage facility, if you need a full server OS then I think Mr Gates has one you can buy for about £500 and if you have a large business network then I'm not sure naslite is really the correct product


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 5:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 11:08 am
Posts: 225
I have to agree.

NASLite is not really suitable for a corporate environment due to its lack of security.

I live for network security (both work and play) and I can say from real world experince that most of the time a client has a breach it is actually an employee through mistake or malice.

Not having a default gateway reduces the risk of NASLite being deployed in an environment it is not designed for.

OK so you could put lots of disclaimers all over the place but what would happen is that someone would do it anyway and then when they were hacked the NAS team would have to live with the bad press associated with it. Unfortunately thats just a fact of life :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 7:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 6:11 am
Posts: 7
can you map the network drive using a computer on the subnet that CAN access Naslite, then share that mapped drive across the network so it can be picked up from the other subnet over the VPN?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 11:08 am
Posts: 225
you sure could


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:53 pm
Posts: 3
(From a newbie) I tried this setup to test this very idea, but couldn't get that to work. I am using Windows XP, connected to my regular network with one NIC and connected to a test NASLite on another NIC. I can map the drive, but cannot share the mapped drive in Windows. What am I doing wrong (besides using Windows). BTW, I am using NASLiteSMB.

Thanks,
Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group